Advertisement IC Markets

Journal automation for prop candidates: what to ignore

Navigate the rules, daily drawdown limits, and consistency guidelines of prop trading firms. Discuss how to pass funded account challenges using scalping strategies.
Post Reply
PropScalpDesk
Posts: 521
Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2026 7:50 pm

Journal automation for prop candidates: what to ignore

Post by PropScalpDesk »

Automation that dumps every tick into a CSV does not make you prop-ready. It makes you busy.

What I ignore in automated journals during a challenge:

- Tick-level equity curves that redraw every second. They invite mid-session storytelling.
- Win-rate dashboards without R. Passing phases care about path and limits more than hit rate.
- Auto tags based on indicator states I do not trade. Noise labels teach nothing.
- Screenshots of every M1 candle. I want entry, exit, and the level I claimed mattered.

What I keep: timestamp, pair, planned R, realised R, whether news window was open, and a one-line process flag (clean / size breach / blackout breach). A simple form or hotkey that writes those six fields beats a fancy logger I never read.

Prop reviewers, if they ask for anything, get clarity. You get the same. Ignore tools that produce pages you will not open on Sunday.

If an automation vendor promises prop-ready journals out of the box, I still map their fields to my six. Anything that does not map gets ignored until after the phase.
Recommended broker for automated trading & scalping IC Markets
Shadow Trader
Posts: 959
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2026 5:19 pm

Re: Journal automation for prop candidates: what to ignore

Post by Shadow Trader »

Your six fields are close to mine. The one I'd add is time in trade, because on M1 it tells me more about process than realised R does. When my losers start lasting longer than my winners, I'm holding and hoping, and that shows up a week before the drawdown does.

I'd push back gently on ignoring win rate completely. On its own it's useless, agreed. But during a phase I watch it next to average R, because a sudden drop in hit rate at the same R usually means I'm forcing setups at the wrong time of day.

The process flag is the best part of the list. I use your three plus one more, late entry, meaning I took the setup more than one M1 bar after the trigger. Those are about a fifth of my tickets and most of my scratch losses.

How do you log the flag in practice? A hotkey into a sheet, or written by hand at the end of each trade?
Shadow Trader
Posts: 959
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2026 5:19 pm

Re: Journal automation for prop candidates: what to ignore

Post by Shadow Trader »

The number I pair with time in trade now is decision count. On M1 I log how many times I touched the stop or target order after entry, and anything above one touch on a loser is a hold and hope flag even if the duration looks normal.

That came from a phase where losers lasted seven minutes on average, which looked fine next to my winners at five. The losers had three or four order changes while the winners had zero.

So the sheet got a second process flag: order edits. Clean means no edits after fill. Late entry still stands, and the two flags together catch more of the mess than either alone.

I still keep win rate next to average R during a phase, but only as a weekly glance, never mid session. Mid session it just invites a story about the next setup fixing the week.

PropScalpDesk, when you map a vendor journal to your six fields, do you drop anything that cannot be entered in under five seconds? Speed of logging is what kept me from abandoning the sheet.
Post Reply