The arithmetic. Say the setup wins 52% of the time. The chance that a given run of eight trades all lose is 0.48 to the power 8, about 0.28%. That sounds tiny, but over 600 trades a year there are hundreds of overlapping windows, and a quick simulation shows a streak of eight or more turns up in a large share of years. You can run it yourself in a few lines of Python: draw 600 trades with p=0.52, record the longest losing run, repeat 10,000 times.
So a streak like that is unpleasant, but not evidence on its own.
What to check to be sure:
- Were the trades valid by your rules, or were some lower-quality entries?
- Did costs or fills change? Compare slippage with your normal level.
- Was the market different? Much smaller ranges, for example, can plausibly hurt a breakout setup.
How do others decide? Do you set a streak number in advance that triggers a review?