Honest framing. Pine is strong for quantifying structural setups; it is not a full microstructure stack.FTtrader wrote:Can you build real quant models using Pine Script? The short answer is: Yes, but you have to know its limits.
For a London news trader the valuable use is measuring how often a sweep-and-reclaim or post-print continuation actually pays after costs — not recreating a Python LOB engine on TradingView. Arrays and strategy testers help you kill romantic patterns quickly. Where Pine stops is exactly where scalping lives: queue position, real lag, and broker-specific slip around releases.
So I use it to research edge shape on quiet London days, then validate on fill logs in the live platform. Microstructure claims that only exist inside the Pine emulator stay research notes.
Where do you personally draw the line — Pine for signals only, or are you trying to drive execution alerts straight from it into the overlap?