Partial fills on ECN accounts when the book is thin
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2026 10:19 pm
Partial fills on ECN accounts when the book is thin
Partial fills catch newer ECN users off guard. A ten-lot order gets four lots at one price, three at the next, and the rest wherever the book allows. On a scalp with a four-pip target, that spread of fills changes the entire math.
The issue is worst on crosses and exotics during off-peak hours, when the depth at the best price might be a single lot or two. The platform shows one number, yet the volume-weighted average entry sits well away from it.
Some platforms offer fill policies like fill-or-kill, immediate-or-cancel, and return. Each behaves differently. Fill-or-kill rejects the whole order if full size is not available, which protects entry price at the cost of missed trades. Immediate-or-cancel takes what exists and drops the rest.
For scalpers, a partial fill also creates awkward position sizes, with stops and targets that no longer match the intended risk.
A practical habit is scaling order size to the visible depth instead of the account balance.
How is size handled on thinner pairs, and has a policy like fill-or-kill ever saved a trade?
Partial fills catch newer ECN users off guard. A ten-lot order gets four lots at one price, three at the next, and the rest wherever the book allows. On a scalp with a four-pip target, that spread of fills changes the entire math.
The issue is worst on crosses and exotics during off-peak hours, when the depth at the best price might be a single lot or two. The platform shows one number, yet the volume-weighted average entry sits well away from it.
Some platforms offer fill policies like fill-or-kill, immediate-or-cancel, and return. Each behaves differently. Fill-or-kill rejects the whole order if full size is not available, which protects entry price at the cost of missed trades. Immediate-or-cancel takes what exists and drops the rest.
For scalpers, a partial fill also creates awkward position sizes, with stops and targets that no longer match the intended risk.
A practical habit is scaling order size to the visible depth instead of the account balance.
How is size handled on thinner pairs, and has a policy like fill-or-kill ever saved a trade?