Page 1 of 1

Signal sellers and the latency nobody mentions

Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2026 7:24 pm
by Amanhasnoname
Paid signal services promise entries and exits delivered by message. For a scalping approach, the delay between the provider's trade and the subscriber's action destroys the edge.

The chain: the provider decides, enters the trade, writes the message, the platform sends it, the subscriber's device receives the notification, the subscriber reads it, opens the platform, and places the order. Even in the best case, that takes several seconds. In practice, ten to thirty seconds or more.

For a trade with a two pip target held for twenty seconds, the signal arrives after the move is over. Entering then means buying the top.

Providers often report results on their own fills, with no allowance for the follower's slippage. The advertised performance is not what followers experience.

Test by following signals on a demo and logging the delay and the entry price difference. Compare the results with those claimed.

Services that provide automatic copying have shorter delays but still not zero.

Slow signals suit slower strategies. Scalping signals are a mismatch.

What price difference appeared between the signal's stated entry and the actual follower entry in tests?