Page 1 of 1

Rebate programs quietly change how people trade

Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2026 10:17 am
by Shadow Trader
Some brokers and introducing agencies pay a rebate per lot, a small sum returned for every trade. For high-volume scalpers, the numbers look attractive. Two dollars back per lot on a hundred lots a day adds up.

The risk is subtle. Rebates reward volume, not profit. A trader earning a rebate on every trade starts to feel that each trade has a cushion, and the bar for taking marginal setups creeps down.

Rebates also hide the true cost structure. A broker that pays generous rebates may be recovering the money through wider spreads, slower execution or markups on swaps. The headline cost after rebate can look good while the actual fills suffer.

A fair comparison needs the net cost per round turn, including spread, commission, slippage and rebate, measured over real trades.

Another question is who pays the rebate. In some arrangements, the introducer takes a share of the spread, and the account's execution is no different from a non-rebate account. In others, the rebate account sits in a separate pricing group.

Tracking trade count before and after joining a rebate program shows whether behaviour changed.

Has a rebate ever improved the real, all-in cost of trading, or just the feeling of it?