Reading an execution policy like a scalper
Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2026 5:46 am
Regulated brokers must publish an order execution policy. It's a dry document, often a PDF. For a scalper it's among the most informative things available.
Several questions can be answered from it. Does the broker act as principal or agent? Is client flow hedged externally, or kept internally? Which liquidity providers are used? How is slippage treated, symmetrical or not? Are there rules on last look, on rejecting orders, on order size limits?
Key phrases deserve attention. "Best execution" has a specific regulatory meaning but is interpreted flexibly. "Price improvement" says whether positive slippage is passed on. "Discretion" and "reserve the right" mark areas where the broker keeps freedom to act.
Another item is the trading hours for each symbol, including daily breaks. The policy lists them, and they often differ from what users assume.
Comparing the policy with observed behavior is a useful exercise. If the document says slippage is symmetric and the fill ledger shows otherwise, that's a documented discrepancy worth raising with support.
Few traders read the policy, which is why brokers can be vague without consequence.
What has been learned from an execution policy that changed how an account was used?
Several questions can be answered from it. Does the broker act as principal or agent? Is client flow hedged externally, or kept internally? Which liquidity providers are used? How is slippage treated, symmetrical or not? Are there rules on last look, on rejecting orders, on order size limits?
Key phrases deserve attention. "Best execution" has a specific regulatory meaning but is interpreted flexibly. "Price improvement" says whether positive slippage is passed on. "Discretion" and "reserve the right" mark areas where the broker keeps freedom to act.
Another item is the trading hours for each symbol, including daily breaks. The policy lists them, and they often differ from what users assume.
Comparing the policy with observed behavior is a useful exercise. If the document says slippage is symmetric and the fill ledger shows otherwise, that's a documented discrepancy worth raising with support.
Few traders read the policy, which is why brokers can be vague without consequence.
What has been learned from an execution policy that changed how an account was used?