Wide but deep, narrow but empty
Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2026 1:37 am
Spread alone doesn't say how much can be traded. Two quotes can show the same 0.3 pip spread and offer completely different experiences.
In the first case, the book has deep size at each level. A market order of several lots moves the price by a fraction of a pip. In the second, the best bid and offer have tiny size, and a modest order walks through several levels.
Retail platforms rarely show this difference. The quote window shows the best bid and ask, and nothing else. Only the fills reveal how thin the book was, and by then the damage is done.
An example: a scalper trades 1 lot in EURUSD at 3am London time. The spread is 0.4 and looks perfectly acceptable. The fill is 0.8 pips from the click price, because the first level was only worth a few hundred thousand.
A scalper trading the same size at 9am London sees the same spread and a fill at the quoted price.
Spread without depth is half of the information. The way to measure depth indirectly is to compare fill prices for different order sizes at the same time of day. The slope tells everything.
One way to measure depth indirectly is to send market orders of increasing size, in a quiet and a busy hour, and plot the slippage against the size. The slope shows how fast the book thins. Doing this with micro lots costs very little and gives a picture that no spread figure can provide.
It also shows where the size limit lies for a particular strategy, beyond which fills start to erode the edge.
Does fill quality worsen sharply when size is increased on your account, and at what size?
In the first case, the book has deep size at each level. A market order of several lots moves the price by a fraction of a pip. In the second, the best bid and offer have tiny size, and a modest order walks through several levels.
Retail platforms rarely show this difference. The quote window shows the best bid and ask, and nothing else. Only the fills reveal how thin the book was, and by then the damage is done.
An example: a scalper trades 1 lot in EURUSD at 3am London time. The spread is 0.4 and looks perfectly acceptable. The fill is 0.8 pips from the click price, because the first level was only worth a few hundred thousand.
A scalper trading the same size at 9am London sees the same spread and a fill at the quoted price.
Spread without depth is half of the information. The way to measure depth indirectly is to compare fill prices for different order sizes at the same time of day. The slope tells everything.
One way to measure depth indirectly is to send market orders of increasing size, in a quiet and a busy hour, and plot the slippage against the size. The slope shows how fast the book thins. Doing this with micro lots costs very little and gives a picture that no spread figure can provide.
It also shows where the size limit lies for a particular strategy, beyond which fills start to erode the edge.
Does fill quality worsen sharply when size is increased on your account, and at what size?