The difference between a bad trade and a losing trade
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2026 9:28 pm
It's worth separating these two clearly. A losing trade followed the rules and lost. A bad trade broke the rules, win or lose.
Counting them separately in a journal is simple: add a column, process OK or not, filled in honestly before looking at the result.
What to look for after a couple of months:
A way to grade that keeps the focus right: process first, result second. A good losing trade gets a check mark. A bad winning trade gets a cross. The P&L column still exists, but it isn't the grade.
It also changes how losses feel. If a trade followed the plan, the loss is just the cost of running the strategy, the same as spread or commission. That makes the next trade easier to take.
Does anyone grade trades on process like this? How do you handle the grey cases?
Counting them separately in a journal is simple: add a column, process OK or not, filled in honestly before looking at the result.
What to look for after a couple of months:
- The share of trades that broke a rule.
- The average result of those trades.
- Especially the bad trades that won.
A way to grade that keeps the focus right: process first, result second. A good losing trade gets a check mark. A bad winning trade gets a cross. The P&L column still exists, but it isn't the grade.
It also changes how losses feel. If a trade followed the plan, the loss is just the cost of running the strategy, the same as spread or commission. That makes the next trade easier to take.
Does anyone grade trades on process like this? How do you handle the grey cases?