Repeated ticks at one price are a message
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2026 9:28 am
Repeated ticks at one price are a message
Watch the tick feed on a quiet pair. Occasionally the price touches the same level over and over: 1.0850, 1.0851, 1.0850, 1.0851, 1.0850, without breaking through. The tick count rises while the range stays flat.
What this suggests is absorption. Someone is selling into every uptick, or buying into every downtick, with enough size to hold the level. The orders are being filled, which is why the tick count is high, but the price cannot move beyond.
Absorption usually precedes one of two things. Either the large participant finishes, and price moves away fast in the opposite direction, or the opposing flow gets exhausted and the level gives way with momentum.
Retail platforms do not show real volume, but tick behaviour offers a rough proxy. A scalper who watches the repeated testing of a level, rather than just the candle, sometimes gets a few seconds of notice.
The reading is not reliable enough to bet the account on. As a filter, it adds a sliver of information that candle charts hide completely.
Has repeated testing of a level ever preceded a sharp move in a way that could be counted and verified?
Watch the tick feed on a quiet pair. Occasionally the price touches the same level over and over: 1.0850, 1.0851, 1.0850, 1.0851, 1.0850, without breaking through. The tick count rises while the range stays flat.
What this suggests is absorption. Someone is selling into every uptick, or buying into every downtick, with enough size to hold the level. The orders are being filled, which is why the tick count is high, but the price cannot move beyond.
Absorption usually precedes one of two things. Either the large participant finishes, and price moves away fast in the opposite direction, or the opposing flow gets exhausted and the level gives way with momentum.
Retail platforms do not show real volume, but tick behaviour offers a rough proxy. A scalper who watches the repeated testing of a level, rather than just the candle, sometimes gets a few seconds of notice.
The reading is not reliable enough to bet the account on. As a filter, it adds a sliver of information that candle charts hide completely.
Has repeated testing of a level ever preceded a sharp move in a way that could be counted and verified?