Fixed fractional versus volatility-adjusted sizing for scalps
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2026 9:51 pm
Two common ways to size: fixed fractional (risk a fixed percentage per trade, size based on stop) and volatility-adjusted (size based on ATR, stop also based on ATR). For scalping, they work out differently than you might think.
Fixed fractional
I tested both over the same 400 trades (re-simulated): expectancy similar, but the volatility-adjusted version had fewer trades stopped out by noise, and a smoother equity curve.
What I do now: structure-based stop, but never tighter than 0.7× ATR. A hybrid. How do you size your scalps?
Fixed fractional
- Risk 0.5% per trade, stop based on structure.
- A wide stop means a small size, a tight stop a large size.
- Risk per trade stays the same in money.
- Stop = 1× ATR(14) on M5, size = risk / stop.
- On volatile days, a wider stop and smaller size, automatically.
- Risk in money also stays the same, but the stop no longer follows structure.
I tested both over the same 400 trades (re-simulated): expectancy similar, but the volatility-adjusted version had fewer trades stopped out by noise, and a smoother equity curve.
What I do now: structure-based stop, but never tighter than 0.7× ATR. A hybrid. How do you size your scalps?