forex-scalping.com

Turning the Spread Into Dollars on a Real Trade

Scenario: you buy 0.50 lots of EUR/USD and the spread is 1.2 pips. What does the spread cost you?

Work it out. At 0.50 lots, one pip is worth 5 dollars. A 1.2-pip spread costs 1.2 times 5, which is 6 dollars. You pay it the moment you enter, because you buy at the ask and the position can be closed only at the bid.

Now see it in context. If your stop risks 40 dollars, the spread is 15 percent of the risk. If your target is 100 dollars, it is 6 percent of the reward.

Next, think in frequency. If you take 20 such trades a month, the spread costs 120 dollars. On a 5,000-dollar account, that is 2.4 percent a month, an expense your strategy must overcome before making any profit.

Compare with a swing trader taking four trades a month at 0.20 lots with a 1.2-pip spread: cost 2.40 dollars per trade, about 10 dollars a month, or 0.2 percent on the same account.

The difference between the two is a first-order effect on viability. High-frequency trading on small stops needs a much larger edge per trade to cover costs.

Takeaway: convert the spread to dollars and to a percentage of risk on every trade type you consider.

Practical step: compute your monthly spread cost from your last month of trades.

Thinking about spread as a share of risk and reward makes it concrete. For scalpers with small targets, spread can easily take 20% or more of the target, which is a large hurdle. Trading during the hours with the tightest spreads helps reduce it.

The context figures are what make this calculation useful. Six dollars of spread sounds trivial, but as 15 percent of a 40 dollar risk, it's a significant cost on every trade. If the strategy's edge is, say, 0.2R per trade, the spread alone consumes three quarters of it. Thinking of the spread as a share of the risk, rather than in dollars or pips, shows immediately whether a strategy's edge is large enough to cover its costs. Strategies with tight stops face a larger share, which is why scalping requires both low spreads and a strong edge.

The frequency comparison shows how trading style affects costs. Twenty trades a month at 0.50 lots costs 120 dollars in spread, 2.4 percent of a 5,000 dollar account each month. Four trades at 0.20 lots costs under 10 dollars, about 0.2 percent. Over a year, the active trader pays about 29 percent of the account in spread, while the swing trader pays about 2.3 percent. The active trader needs to earn 2.4 percent a month just to break even on spread, before commissions, swaps, or slippage. That's a high bar that many strategies don't clear.

I did this for last month and the result was higher than I guessed. I took 142 trades averaging 0.35 lots on EUR/USD, so a pip was worth 3.50 dollars. I split by session: 31 trades were in the late Asian hours at about 1.6 pips of spread, and 111 were at about 0.7. The first group cost roughly 174 dollars and the second roughly 272. The total was about 446 dollars, which is 5.6 percent of my 8,000 dollar account for the month, before commission.

What changed my routine was the first group. Those 31 trades were 22 percent of my volume but 39 percent of the spread bill. At London spreads they would have cost around 76 dollars, so I was leaving about 100 dollars on the table for trading when I was bored.

I now stop taking entries after the New York close until Tokyo is well underway.

The point about paying the spread at entry is worth clarifying. When you buy at the ask, the position is immediately valued at the bid, so it shows a loss equal to the spread. That loss is real: if you closed immediately, you'd lose exactly that amount. Some traders find it frustrating to see every trade start in the red, but it's simply the cost of the trade made visible. For short trades, entry is at the bid and the position is valued at the ask, so the same initial loss appears. Either way, a round trip always costs one full spread.

Computing the monthly spread cost from your last month of trades, as the practical step suggests, is quick and often surprising. Most traders underestimate how much they pay. Multiplying the number of trades by the average lot size, the average spread, and the pip value gives a good estimate. Comparing it with the month's gross profit shows what share costs consumed. Has anyone here calculated their monthly spread cost and been surprised by the total? I'd be interested in whether it led you to change pairs, trading times, or the number of trades you took.