Margin on 10 lots when the first $500,000 of notional is 1:500 and the rest 1:200
Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2026 7:45 pm
Margin on 10 lots when the first $500,000 of notional is 1:500 and the rest 1:200
A broker advertising 1:500 often means up to 1:500, and for larger positions the ratio steps down. A schedule might read: the first $500,000 of notional at 1:500, anything above at 1:200. I made that schedule up, but it shows the sums to do before stacking size.
Take 10 lots of EURUSD at 1.0850. Notional is 10 x 100,000 x 1.0850 = $1,085,000.
Flat 1:500 would need 1,085,000 / 500 = $2,170 of margin.
With the tiers, the first $500,000 at 1:500 needs $1,000. The remaining $585,000 at 1:200 needs $2,925. Total $3,925. The effective leverage on that position is 1,085,000 / 3,925, which is 276 to 1, not 500.
At 20 lots the notional is $2,170,000. Tiered margin is 1,000 + (1,670,000 / 200) = $9,350, against $4,340 under a flat 1:500. Doubling the size more than doubles the margin, and effective leverage falls to 232.
Why this matters: on a $5,000 account holding those 10 lots, margin level is 5,000 / 3,925 = 127% rather than 230%. If the broker stops out at 50%, equity can fall to $1,962 under the tiered rule but to $1,085 under the flat one. At $100 a pip for 10 lots, that is a cushion of about 30 pips against 39 pips. A 10 lot position on $5,000 is silly, of course. It just makes the gap visible.
Whether the tiers apply per position, per symbol or across the whole account changes everything, and the answer is usually in a leverage table or the contract specification, not in the headline.
A broker advertising 1:500 often means up to 1:500, and for larger positions the ratio steps down. A schedule might read: the first $500,000 of notional at 1:500, anything above at 1:200. I made that schedule up, but it shows the sums to do before stacking size.
Take 10 lots of EURUSD at 1.0850. Notional is 10 x 100,000 x 1.0850 = $1,085,000.
Flat 1:500 would need 1,085,000 / 500 = $2,170 of margin.
With the tiers, the first $500,000 at 1:500 needs $1,000. The remaining $585,000 at 1:200 needs $2,925. Total $3,925. The effective leverage on that position is 1,085,000 / 3,925, which is 276 to 1, not 500.
At 20 lots the notional is $2,170,000. Tiered margin is 1,000 + (1,670,000 / 200) = $9,350, against $4,340 under a flat 1:500. Doubling the size more than doubles the margin, and effective leverage falls to 232.
Why this matters: on a $5,000 account holding those 10 lots, margin level is 5,000 / 3,925 = 127% rather than 230%. If the broker stops out at 50%, equity can fall to $1,962 under the tiered rule but to $1,085 under the flat one. At $100 a pip for 10 lots, that is a cushion of about 30 pips against 39 pips. A 10 lot position on $5,000 is silly, of course. It just makes the gap visible.
Whether the tiers apply per position, per symbol or across the whole account changes everything, and the answer is usually in a leverage table or the contract specification, not in the headline.