forex-scalping.com

Scalping USDJPY while the Nikkei is falling hard

During the Asian session, USDJPY and the Nikkei often move together. When Japanese stocks drop hard, the yen tends to strengthen as people reduce risk and close carry positions. I keep a Nikkei futures chart next to USDJPY for this reason.

On a day when the index is falling fast, USDJPY shorts look obvious. The issue is that the move is driven by the stock market, not by anything in FX, so it comes in waves. The index drops, USDJPY follows, then the index stabilises for a few minutes and USDJPY snaps back quite sharply. Trying to hold a short through that is uncomfortable.

What I do instead is use the index as a timing tool. I look to short USDJPY on pullbacks while the Nikkei is still making new lows. If the index stops making new lows and starts basing, I stop looking for USDJPY shorts, even if the FX chart still looks bearish.

None of this applies on days when stocks are falling for reasons specific to Japanese companies. Then the yen often doesn't react much.

The wave pattern is very familiar from the Tokyo morning. For timing, the Topix futures are a decent cross check next to the Nikkei, because a selloff led by a few heavy index names shows up less there. When both stop making new lows for several minutes, USDJPY usually starts its snap back. Another tell is the yen crosses. If AUDJPY and EURJPY keep falling while USDJPY bounces, the risk off move is still going and the bounce is just dollar demand. Holding a short through that is risky without a wider stop.

A useful cross check is US index futures during the Asian session. If the Nikkei and US futures are both falling, the risk off move is broad and the yen bid is more reliable. If the Nikkei is falling alone while US futures are steady, it's more likely a local story, and USDJPY may not follow. Two charts, a few seconds, and it changes how much conviction I put behind a short. On days when both are dropping, I'm more willing to hold a short through the small bounces, since the broader pressure tends to resume. When only the Nikkei is falling, I take quicker profits and expect the move to stall sooner.

Japanese officials talking about the yen can override the stock link completely. If the yen has already strengthened a lot and there's any hint of comments from the finance ministry, the move can reverse sharply regardless of the Nikkei. On days with a lot of yen strength I keep an eye on headlines and keep targets modest, because a single comment can wipe out the move in seconds. Japanese officials usually escalate their language in stages before acting. Following the wording in headlines gives some warning, though not much. If the yen has moved several big figures in a short time, even a mild comment can turn USDJPY sharply, so smaller targets are sensible on those days. Keeping a headline feed open during those sessions is the minimum, and turning down size when officials start talking is sensible.

Size is the thing I adjust most on these days. USDJPY becomes much more volatile when stocks are dropping, so the normal stop gets tagged by noise. I widen the stop to match the larger candles and cut the lot size so the money at risk is the same. Without that adjustment the trades tend to get shaken out right before the move continues. The point is that the money at risk stays the same while the stop gets room to breathe. If the wider stop would need a lot size below your broker's minimum, that tells you the account is too small to trade that day's volatility, and sitting out is the better choice.

Cross yen pairs like AUDJPY often move more than USDJPY on these days, because they combine the yen strength with weakness in riskier currencies. That makes them tempting. The spreads are wider though, and the moves are even more jerky. I prefer staying with USDJPY, accepting a smaller move in exchange for tighter costs and cleaner fills. There is also more slippage on crosses during sharp moves, since liquidity is thinner than in USDJPY. Over many trades that adds up. For anyone who prefers crosses, at least compare the spread and slippage on both before deciding.

Two setups are common. One is watching the chart continuously and reacting by eye. The other is stepping back and letting alerts call attention when price reaches a level.

Staring has real benefits. Fast reaction to a pattern forming, a feel for how price is moving into a level, and no dependency on an alert being set correctly. The drawback is fatigue. After a couple of hours, attention narrows and the screen starts to be seen without being read. Trades also get taken because something is moving, not because something qualified.

Alerts flip the profile. They protect energy and force a pre-decision, since a level has to be chosen in advance. The weakness is that an alert fires when price touches a level, which can be late for a scalp, and a poorly chosen sound gets ignored within a week.

A hybrid seems to suit many people: alerts at the levels that matter, different sounds for different types of event, and full attention only when one fires. Some also add a quiet alert for spread widening, since that is the warning that is hard to see on a chart.

Notification delays matter. A phone push can lag several seconds, while a desktop terminal alert is generally faster. For scalping, the delay of the channel decides whether the alert is useful at all.

Which has worked better in practice, and has anyone measured whether trade quality changed after dropping the habit of watching every tick?