Using volume profile differently in Asia and London
Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2026 5:42 pm
Volume profile shows where trading activity concentrated over a period. On FX, it's usually based on tick volume, which has limitations. But it can still help, and it behaves differently by session.
Asia:
- Profiles tend to be narrow, with a clear point of control (POC).
- Range edges often hold.
- Useful for identifying the range that London might break.
London:
- Profiles are wider and can shift quickly.
- The Asia POC often acts as a reference: London may test it before moving away.
- High-volume nodes from the previous day matter more.
Practical uses:
- Mark the Asia POC and value area before London opens.
- Watch whether London accepts (trades through and holds) or rejects (bounces) these levels.
- In London, look for low-volume areas where price moves quickly.
Limitations: tick volume isn't real volume, and different brokers will show different profiles.
Does anyone use volume profile on FX? Which session do you find it most useful in?
Asia:
- Profiles tend to be narrow, with a clear point of control (POC).
- Range edges often hold.
- Useful for identifying the range that London might break.
London:
- Profiles are wider and can shift quickly.
- The Asia POC often acts as a reference: London may test it before moving away.
- High-volume nodes from the previous day matter more.
Practical uses:
- Mark the Asia POC and value area before London opens.
- Watch whether London accepts (trades through and holds) or rejects (bounces) these levels.
- In London, look for low-volume areas where price moves quickly.
Limitations: tick volume isn't real volume, and different brokers will show different profiles.
Does anyone use volume profile on FX? Which session do you find it most useful in?