forex-scalping.com

H1 support inside an M5 downtrend: when timeframes point opposite ways

A common situation: the M5 chart is making lower highs and lower lows, clean downtrend. But price is approaching a support level on H1 that has held several times. The M5 says sell, the H1 says this is where buyers have shown up before.

There's no rule that settles this. What I do is change what I'm looking for depending on where price is relative to the H1 level.

Above the level, I'll still take M5 shorts, but with targets that stop at or just before the H1 support. No point holding for a bigger move into a level where buyers have been active.

At the level, I don't short. That's the worst place for a trend continuation entry, because if the H1 level holds, the reversal can be fast.

If the level breaks with a clear close on M15 or H1, the M5 downtrend has the higher timeframe on its side again, and I'm more willing to hold shorts for further targets.

If the level holds and the M5 makes a higher low, I can look at longs, but carefully, since the M5 trend has only just started to turn.

Most of the losing trades I see in this situation come from shorting right into the H1 level because the M5 looked strong.

The size of the M5 trend relative to the H1 level matters. If the M5 downtrend is just a pullback within an H1 uptrend, the H1 level is likely to hold. If the M5 downtrend is part of a bigger move that's already broken H1 structure, the H1 support is weaker. Looking at the H4 can help decide which story you're in. It sounds like a lot of timeframes, but it takes a few seconds to flick through them, and it often explains why the M5 trend stalls exactly where it does.

Targets are where this framework helps most. A lot of scalpers set targets by a fixed R multiple, like two R. If the H1 level sits at one R from entry, a two R target means holding through the zone where the trade is most likely to stall. Adjusting the target to the H1 level, even if that gives a lower R, often improves results more than tweaking entries. A trade that reliably reaches one point two R is better than one that sometimes reaches two R and often reverses at one.

One approach is to treat the H1 support as a target for the M5 short, not a place to buy. The M5 trend continues until price reaches the H1 level, and then you wait to see how it reacts.

If the M5 trend breaks at the H1 level with a higher low, that can be a long setup. Until then, the timeframes are not really in conflict, they just describe different parts of the move.

How long the M5 downtrend has been running matters. A fresh M5 downtrend that has just started pushing into H1 support is more likely to break it than an old, tired one that's been grinding down for hours. The tired one might have used up most of its sellers on the way down. I look at the speed of the last few M5 legs. If they're shrinking and the pullbacks are getting bigger, the downtrend is slowing as it reaches support, and the H1 level has a decent chance of holding. If the legs are still strong, I wouldn't bet on the bounce.

Do you wait for the M5 structure to break before trading the H1 support? I usually want at least a higher low on M5, or a break of the last M5 lower high, before buying at the H1 level. Buying straight into support while the M5 is still making lower lows is catching a falling knife, even if the level is strong. The confirmation costs a few pips of entry price but avoids many trades where the level breaks. I'd be interested to hear if anyone has found that entering without confirmation works better on certain pairs.