Monthly check: planned trades vs taken trades
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2026 9:13 pm
Monthly check: planned trades vs taken trades
Every month I compare two numbers: how many valid setups appeared according to my rules, and how many I actually traded. It sounds basic, but it shows a lot.
To do this you need to log setups whether or not you take them, ideally with a screenshot. At the end of the month, you have a list of everything that met your criteria and can compare it with your trade log.
If you took far fewer trades than the setups that appeared, you may be hesitating, missing them because you weren't watching, or filtering more than your rules say. If you took more trades than valid setups, some of your trades didn't meet your rules.
The next step is to compare results. What would the missed setups have done if you'd taken them? If they would have been profitable on balance, your hesitation is costing you. If they would have lost, maybe your instinct to skip them is picking up on something your rules don't capture, which is worth investigating.
It's also a good reality check on the strategy. If you take all valid setups and the results over time look different from your backtest, that's information too.
It takes discipline to log the skipped setups, but it's one of the most useful things I've added to my review.
Does anyone else track this?
Every month I compare two numbers: how many valid setups appeared according to my rules, and how many I actually traded. It sounds basic, but it shows a lot.
To do this you need to log setups whether or not you take them, ideally with a screenshot. At the end of the month, you have a list of everything that met your criteria and can compare it with your trade log.
If you took far fewer trades than the setups that appeared, you may be hesitating, missing them because you weren't watching, or filtering more than your rules say. If you took more trades than valid setups, some of your trades didn't meet your rules.
The next step is to compare results. What would the missed setups have done if you'd taken them? If they would have been profitable on balance, your hesitation is costing you. If they would have lost, maybe your instinct to skip them is picking up on something your rules don't capture, which is worth investigating.
It's also a good reality check on the strategy. If you take all valid setups and the results over time look different from your backtest, that's information too.
It takes discipline to log the skipped setups, but it's one of the most useful things I've added to my review.
Does anyone else track this?