Second test of the London high: why I'd rather trade the retest than the first touch
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2026 8:32 pm
Second test of the London high: why I'd rather trade the retest than the first touch
When price runs into a level for the first time, everyone is watching it. Breakout traders are waiting to buy above, faders are waiting to sell into it, and stops are sitting just beyond. The first touch is noisy because all of that gets triggered at once, and the candle that results often tells you very little.
The second test is different. By then you've seen how price behaved on the first touch. Did it reject cleanly and fall a fair distance, or did it hover just under and grind? Did the pullback between touches hold a higher low, or did it lose ground? That information is the whole reason I wait.
If the first test produced a strong rejection and the second test arrives on weaker momentum, smaller candles and less range, that leans toward the level holding again. If the pullback was shallow and price comes back fast with bigger candles, that leans toward a break.
The cost of waiting is real. Some levels never get a second test and you just miss the move. I'm fine with that. A missed trade costs nothing, and the second test gives me a stop location that actually means something, beyond the high of the first reaction rather than a guess.
How many of you treat the first touch as information only?
When price runs into a level for the first time, everyone is watching it. Breakout traders are waiting to buy above, faders are waiting to sell into it, and stops are sitting just beyond. The first touch is noisy because all of that gets triggered at once, and the candle that results often tells you very little.
The second test is different. By then you've seen how price behaved on the first touch. Did it reject cleanly and fall a fair distance, or did it hover just under and grind? Did the pullback between touches hold a higher low, or did it lose ground? That information is the whole reason I wait.
If the first test produced a strong rejection and the second test arrives on weaker momentum, smaller candles and less range, that leans toward the level holding again. If the pullback was shallow and price comes back fast with bigger candles, that leans toward a break.
The cost of waiting is real. Some levels never get a second test and you just miss the move. I'm fine with that. A missed trade costs nothing, and the second test gives me a stop location that actually means something, beyond the high of the first reaction rather than a guess.
How many of you treat the first touch as information only?