Page 1 of 1

Wicks Versus Closes: Which Part of the Candle Deserves Your Trust?

Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2026 12:10 pm
by Fairman
Wicks Versus Closes: Which Part of the Candle Deserves Your Trust?

Every candle has a body and wicks, and traders disagree about which tells the truth. The answer depends on what you are trying to learn.
diagram.png
diagram.png (37.83 KiB) Viewed 25 times
The close is the price the market settled at when the period ended. It reflects where participants were willing to hold positions after all the intra-period action. Many traders treat closes as more meaningful than highs and lows, because a close beyond a level shows acceptance, while a wick beyond it only shows a visit.

Wicks show rejection. A long upper wick means price rose and was sold back down, evidence that sellers defended that area. Thin-liquidity spikes also produce wicks, and some of them carry little information, especially during news or rollover.

A practical approach is to use both for different jobs. Use closes to confirm breakouts: a candle that closes beyond a level is stronger evidence than one that only pokes through. Use wicks to find zones: the extremes of wicks mark where the market reacted.

Be consistent about it. If you draw zones using wicks, test breaks using closes, and write that rule down.

Also remember that wick sizes depend on your broker's feed and timeframe, so the same candle can look different elsewhere.

Practical step: for ten recent breakouts, compare outcomes when the first candle closed beyond the level against those that only wicked beyond.

Re: Wicks Versus Closes: Which Part of the Candle Deserves Your Trust?

Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2026 12:39 pm
by Fairman
Wicks for zones and closes for breaks is a good simple split. Just write down which timeframe's close counts, otherwise you'll pick the one that agrees with you in the moment. For example, if you trade from the 1 hour chart, decide that only a 1 hour close beyond the level counts as a break, not a 5 minute one. It's easy to drop to a lower timeframe when you want a break to be real and move up a timeframe when you don't. Writing it in your plan removes that choice. It also makes backtesting much cleaner, since the same rule gets applied to every example in exactly the same way.

Re: Wicks Versus Closes: Which Part of the Candle Deserves Your Trust?

Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2026 12:54 pm
by Fairman
Rollover and news wicks are worth discounting. A spike to a level at 10pm Lagos time on a thin spread isn't the same as a proper rejection during London. When I mark zones, I check when each wick formed. If the wick that defines a zone happened during the rollover hour or within a minute of a big release, I either ignore it or use the body of the candle instead. Those spikes often reflect a temporary lack of liquidity rather than real buying or selling. Zones built on wicks from normal trading hours tend to hold better, and they're less likely to give you a stop placed in the wrong spot.