What low latency hosting claims mean in practice
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2026 4:33 pm
"Sub-millisecond latency to major trading venues" is printed on half the VPS sales pages I've read this year. It's usually true in a narrow sense and nearly useless in the way most of us read it.
What the number usually describes is the network round trip between the hosting provider's data centre and a particular piece of infrastructure, often a well-known exchange or broker data centre in London, New York or Tokyo. If your broker's trade server sits in that same building, great. If it sits somewhere else, the advertised figure tells you very little.
What actually matters for my orders is the full chain: my click, the terminal, the VPS network, the broker's bridge, their pricing engine and back. Network ping is one link. On my own logs the network part is around 1 ms from a London VPS, yet the time from sending an order to seeing it confirmed in the terminal is typically 30 to 90 ms. Most of that delay isn't something hosting can fix.
So now I ignore the brochure and test ping to my broker's actual trade server, plus order confirmation times during 08:00 to 08:15, for a week.
A provider that gives me 2 ms every time beats one that gives me 0.4 ms most of the time and 40 ms when London opens.
What the number usually describes is the network round trip between the hosting provider's data centre and a particular piece of infrastructure, often a well-known exchange or broker data centre in London, New York or Tokyo. If your broker's trade server sits in that same building, great. If it sits somewhere else, the advertised figure tells you very little.
What actually matters for my orders is the full chain: my click, the terminal, the VPS network, the broker's bridge, their pricing engine and back. Network ping is one link. On my own logs the network part is around 1 ms from a London VPS, yet the time from sending an order to seeing it confirmed in the terminal is typically 30 to 90 ms. Most of that delay isn't something hosting can fix.
So now I ignore the brochure and test ping to my broker's actual trade server, plus order confirmation times during 08:00 to 08:15, for a week.
A provider that gives me 2 ms every time beats one that gives me 0.4 ms most of the time and 40 ms when London opens.