forex-scalping.com

Using Indicators Without Depending on Them

Indicators can be helpful tools, but they can also become crutches. The key is to use them intentionally, not blindly.

What indicators are good for:

- Context. A moving average can quickly show trend direction.
- Momentum. RSI or MACD can suggest the strength behind a move.
- Volatility. ATR helps set stops based on recent range.
- Confirmation. They can support what price is already telling you.

What they aren't good for:

- Predicting the future on their own
- Replacing structure and levels
- Fixing a weak process

Example approaches:

1. RSI divergence at a liquidity sweep. If price makes a new high but RSI makes a lower high, and the high sweeps liquidity, it may add to a bearish case.

2. ATR for stops. Use a multiple of ATR to gauge whether your stop is reasonable for current volatility.

3. Moving average as a filter. Only take buys when price is above a chosen moving average.

Guidelines:

- Use no more than two or three indicators
- Understand what each one measures
- Test how they affect results
- Never let an indicator override your risk rules

Many indicators show the same information in different forms. More indicators rarely mean more clarity.

Price is the source. Indicators are commentary.

The ATR point is where news days bite. A 14-period ATR on the M5 chart includes the release candle for 70 minutes afterwards. If NFP prints a 60 pip bar, the ATR roughly doubles and an "ATR times 1.5" stop suddenly looks sensible at three times its normal width. Then, as the spike rolls out of the window, the same rule shrinks the stop back again while price is still unsettled.

I handle it in one of two ways. Either use a longer ATR on a higher timeframe for stop sizing, so a single bar can't dominate it, or just skip the indicator-based stop for the first hour after a major release and use structure.

Your moving average filter has a similar quirk. Price can cross a 20 EMA on the release spike and cross back within ten minutes, so "only buy above the MA" needs a closing rule or it flips on noise.

A balanced framework. The RSI-divergence-at-sweep example is a good one, because the indicator only adds information at a location that already matters. One practical addition: limit the chart to two or three indicators that measure different things, for example one trend tool, one momentum tool and ATR. Several momentum oscillators at once mostly repeat each other and create conflicting signals.

A simple test of whether an indicator earns its place: remove it for two weeks and see whether the results or decisions change. If not, it was decoration.

The removal test FXS Prop Desk describes is a good one, but two weeks is short for a scalper taking three or four trades a day. That is maybe 35 trades, and a single news week inside it can decide the result on its own.

I run it on decisions rather than results. For each trade I note whether the indicator changed anything, either stopping an entry or moving a stop, and if it changed fewer than one decision in ten it goes.

The RSI divergence example passed that test for me only partly. When I went back through 50 sweeps of the Asian high on EURUSD, divergence was present on 41 of them. It showed up almost every time and barely separated the good sweeps from the bad ones.

On the ATR point, I took a middle route between the two options LondonNewsTrader gives. My stop uses the median true range of the last 14 bars instead of the average, so one 60 pip release candle barely moves it.

The moving average filter I dropped years ago. Swing structure was already telling me the same thing, and the average just arrived later.

Which indicator have others removed and then quietly put back? Mine was ATR, and it lasted about four days off the screen.