Passing FundedNext with M5 instead of M1: trade-offs
Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2026 6:00 pm
FundedNext on M5 instead of M1 — trade-offs
I scalp mostly on M1/M5 hybrid personally, but for a prop pass I experimented with M5-primary to cut noise, reduce trade count, and look more “consistent” under review. Results were mixed — worth discussing openly rather than pretending one timeframe is virtuous.
Trade-offs I saw:
Anyone passed (or failed) by deliberately stepping up a timeframe? What did you change in R size when the chart slowed down?
I scalp mostly on M1/M5 hybrid personally, but for a prop pass I experimented with M5-primary to cut noise, reduce trade count, and look more “consistent” under review. Results were mixed — worth discussing openly rather than pretending one timeframe is virtuous.
Trade-offs I saw:
- + Fewer click-chain opportunities; easier to respect daily loss
- + Stops based on clearer structure; less death-by-spread on tiny targets
- − Slower feedback; easier to overstay a thesis
- − Some London open edges I like simply do not wait for M5 closes
Anyone passed (or failed) by deliberately stepping up a timeframe? What did you change in R size when the chart slowed down?