Screenshot protocol after a reject: what I keep for the weekly review
Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2026 9:05 pm
Execution hygiene — rejects and requotes, logged properly.
A reject that you don’t capture becomes a story by Sunday: “the broker was bad” or “I imagined it.” I prefer files.
Minimum capture when a reject happens
1. Timestamp (platform clock)
2. Symbol, side, size, order type
3. Screenshot of the reject/requote dialogue and the quote board if visible
4. Spread at the moment (typed into the journal if the shot doesn’t show it)
5. Whether I resubmitted, switched to limit, or stood aside
I don’t need a novel. One folder per week, filenames like 2026-09-12_GBPUSD_reject_0831. At weekly review I count rejects by session and by pair. Clusters matter more than one-off noise.
Rules that came from this habit
• No market-order spam after two rejects in a row — pause and reassess
• If rejects cluster only on one symbol in a window, that window gets a filter
• Don’t argue from memory with support; argue from the folder
This isn’t about picking fights with brokers. It’s about knowing whether my timing is the problem. If you already archive rejects, do you also keep the successful fill next to them for comparison, or only the failures?
A reject that you don’t capture becomes a story by Sunday: “the broker was bad” or “I imagined it.” I prefer files.
Minimum capture when a reject happens
1. Timestamp (platform clock)
2. Symbol, side, size, order type
3. Screenshot of the reject/requote dialogue and the quote board if visible
4. Spread at the moment (typed into the journal if the shot doesn’t show it)
5. Whether I resubmitted, switched to limit, or stood aside
I don’t need a novel. One folder per week, filenames like 2026-09-12_GBPUSD_reject_0831. At weekly review I count rejects by session and by pair. Clusters matter more than one-off noise.
Rules that came from this habit
• No market-order spam after two rejects in a row — pause and reassess
• If rejects cluster only on one symbol in a window, that window gets a filter
• Don’t argue from memory with support; argue from the folder
This isn’t about picking fights with brokers. It’s about knowing whether my timing is the problem. If you already archive rejects, do you also keep the successful fill next to them for comparison, or only the failures?